Mike Calou
English 5870
Dr. Devries
February 28, 2009
Paired Observation
Partner: Ned Weidner
Time: 5:30-5:51pm
Place: Mom’s Java House, CSU Stanislaus
Question: How do people interact? What ways do people interact when ordering and working at a coffee shop?
Note-Taking Note-Making
Start observation
Worker 1 (male) greeted a female customer I’m not close enough to hear the conversation.
-eye contact with customer Next time I observe interactions make sure to position myself closer to action.
Worker 2 (female) makes hot drink. She looks
at the coffee machine while making the drink.
Brief conversation between worker 1 and 2
“Large mocha” says worker 2- customer picks up drink
Worker 2 (smiles) greets female customer
Worker 1 makes iced drink while talking to
worker 2.
Worker 2 makes hot dink at espresso machine
Worker 2 cleans metal container
Worker 1 and 2 converse near “Smoothie” sign
Worker 2 points to customer
Worker 2 washes her hands.
Worker 1 (no smile) greets two female customers
- worker 1 is chewing something gum?
Four customers in line
Worker 2 cleans utensils
Worker 2 takes customer (female) order. Worker 2 takes orders faster than worker 1
Worker 1= W1 Worker 2= W2 Abbreviations easier to record
W1 makes hot drink
W2 greets two female customers – takes money
and gives change.
W1 and W2 both making drinks – W2 iced drink,
W1 hot drink
“White mocha” says W1- customer picks up drink
There are no customers in line
W1 makes another hot drink
W2 pours iced drink into cup and says,
“Strawberry smoothie” – customer picks up drink
W2 takes order from two female customers
One person in line
W1 comes to order counter for two clear plastic cups
W2 gives change to female customer.
W1 starts blender
Two male customers in line.
W1 makes another iced drink and turns off blender
W1 gives drink to customer
W2 takes order from male customer
W2 marks cup for order
W2 gives coffee card to customer
W1 makes iced drink
W2 takes order from female customer
W1 makes hot drink
W1 pours white liquid into silver container and puts
Container under espresso machine
End of observation
Reflection
As I was taking notes I couldn’t help but compare the styles of the two workers. I think it is human nature to do this. Worker number one (male) did not appear, at least to me, to be comfortable taking drink orders. He seemed to be more at ease making drinks. The reason I say this is because of “body language.” I did not make any reference to body language in my note taking; however, I was consciously observing body language during the observation. I also think that worker number two (female) appeared more comfortable taking drink and food orders from customers. Again, the reason I feel this way is because of the body language I observed. Let me give you an example. Worker two (female) smiled every time she interacted with a customer. It didn’t make any difference if the customer was male or female. On the other hand, worker one did not smile when he took drink orders. I did take notes that corroborate my previous assumptions about worker one and two. Another example of “body language” that I did not record in my notes was my perception about where each worker appeared to gravitate as they worked. Worker one seemed to me to “gravitate” to the espresso machine and blender. In other words, he appeared to make an effort to make the drinks. Worker two seemed to “gravitate” to the cash register to take customer orders. What I don’t know, and probably should have asked, was whether each worker had assigned jobs or if the workers were supposed to “do what was necessary” to keep drinks going to customers. The answer to this question may have provided insight into my “body language” theory.
What I have learned from this experience is that it really would have helped my reflection if I had recorded some dialogue; dialogue between the workers and the customers and dialogue between the two workers. Dialogue would have given me factual evidence to substantiate my theory about where worker one and two prefer to work: either making drinks or greeting customers. Without dialogue I was left with only superficial observations of overt behavior that I had to “interpret.” I think the problem with ethnographic research is when the ethnographer tries to “interpret” what is happening in a situation. My observations and reflection are biased because I did not have enough information (dialogue) to make an unbiased statement about the interactions of the two workers.
I have read Ned’s notes and reflection and they are very different from my notes and reflection. Ned gave a very focused observation of the scene at Mom’s: smoothie signs, customer descriptions, dialogue. In his note making, Ned made some assumptions: cute customer, tall girls. It is difficult not to bring preconceived thoughts to an observation. As ethnographers, both Ned and I would agree that we need to form a question and then reflect based on actual observation and any other information we can gather about the scene or situation we are observing.
Yep, seems like, but if you hung out in Mom’s for two hours a day, engaged in natural conversation with the workers, guiding those conversations towards the answers to the questions you have brought up above, talked to random customers about whatever comes to mind, also guiding those inquiries towards an understandiing of the ethnography of the college coffe bar, you would probably be able to give a pretty detailed interpretation and analysis of the demographic, function, and some analysis of the meaning of the cultural aspoects of the environment pretty quickly.
Having ideas about what you want to learn in ethnography–you want to learn about how the people in the place you go to observe interact with one another, what culture exists in that place, or what subcultures are represented there, and so forth–is a good idea. However, I am of the opinion that actually taking notes while engaging in the observation of cultural interaction breaks the “fourth wall,” like when a character in a tv drama turns directly to the camera, and makes a statement to the viewers that acknowledges that this is just a show.
I find it more helpful to do a period of observation by being as immediatly participatory in the environment as possible under the circumstances, then writing up some notes immediatly after leaving that place so I do’nt lose the feeling. the specific language, and exaxt actions of the participants is not as important as the “Tone” and “feeling” of that language and those actions. If you have an opportunity to observe over a long period of time, you will pick op the “dialect” of the situation organically anyway, and will be able to reconstruct conversations and such fairly well, or, you can carry a recording device. Even people who know it is present tend to forget about them quickly, and while observing in a classroom, carring a concealed recording device would be unethical, that is not the case in a public place like Mom’s, so long as you are not using it for nefarious purposes, and conceal the identities of the speakers.