Monthly Archives: March 2009

Is Anyone Qualified?

The Liu Yameng article made me wonder: is it possible “to enter a dialogue with comparative scholars in other disciplines as comparative scholars” (334)? I have always wrestled with the idea: can another culture or society truly view another with…

Multicultural Hermeneutics – Commentary

In both the Introduction and Chapter One, Xing Lu lays the groundwork for a historically based portrayal of classical Chinese rhetoric. Before she can present her argument, however, she must first draw the reader’s attention to the notion of “Orientalism”…

Commentary #1 Hsieh/Lu

Keri Ortiz Dr. De Vries ENGL 5001 March 2, 2009   Commentary #1   The Literary Minds and the Carving of Dragonsby Liu Hsieh Rhetoric in Ancient China: Introduction Xing Lu               This is my first experience reading about…

Perceptions and Preconceptions

Tina Bell 5001 Dr. Devries 4 March, 2009 Week 3 Commentary   Perceptions and Preconceptions Throughout the entire reading of Xing Lu’s article, “Rhetoric in Ancient China,” connections to two other interesting works kept weaving through my mind. In my…

Visual Rhetoric

This post is in response to Dr. DeVries post about Nixon/Kennedy and the Aristotle reading.  In this modern or rather postmodern world, not only do we have to deal with constructing arguments in written and verbal forms, but we must have…

Lost in Translation

Xing Lu says one of the problems with the existing research on Chinese rhetoric is a dependency on translations. The texts we have read so far were not originally composed in English; they were written in Greek or Latin or…

Rhetoric vs. Poetic

Rhetoric and poetry have been linked for millenia. Aristotle treated both subjects in works that are still read today. For much of history rhetoric has been considered to be superior to poetry. In section XVI, Cicero declares oratory to be…