Classes

Parent for all the individual classes

Responses

Joel Manfredi Responses to Commentary #3 Dr. De Vries     I read most of the responses to what we thought of Brueggemann’s article concerning her work at Gallaudet University, and I must say that I agree with what most…

Commentary #3

Brenda Jo Brueggeman “Still-Life Representations and Silences in the Participant Observer Role”   Brenda Jo elicits some very thought provoking questions.  She follows in the footsteps of Foucault questioning “what does it matter who is speaking.”  She questions the space…

Commentary #3, Brueggemann

Commentary #3: Brueggemann Maria J. Garcia- 3/10/09   Brenda Jo Brueggemann’s article touched a nerve for me; I really felt a sense of her struggle as she candidly wrote up her experience as a participant-observer of deaf (Deaf) writing students at Gallaudet University…

Commentary 3

“What difference, I ask, does it make who researches, who writes about, who represents ‘subjects’ in composition research? And what difference does it make how these subjects are represented?” As Brueggemann began her dissertation research, she believed herself a distant…

Commentary Three

Mike Calou Commentary Three Still Life: Representations and Silences in the Participant-Observer Role               In this article the author, Brenda Brueggemann, writes a narrative about her experience doing ethnographic research at a deaf college, Gallaudet University.  The author discusses…

Commentary 3

Tina Bell 5870 Dr. De Vries 10 March 2009 Commentary 3     Two weeks ago in the 5870 class we were discussing an issue similar to the one presented in Brenda Jo Brueggemann’s article, “Ethics and Representation in Qualitative…

Commentary #3 Brueggemann

“Still-Life: Representations and Silences in the Participant Observer Role” Brenda Jo Bruggemann   This article presented an interesting and negative approach to ethnographic research. I use the word negative because the researcher seems dissatisfied with her work even though it…